Translations:Benutzer:Arian/Klett-Mini-Test/759/en

This problem becomes acutely virulent when one wishes to develop a biodynamic farm: one needs land, co-workers and capital — that is, a financial volume that can never pay off in monetary terms; the workplace in agriculture is, under present conditions, more expensive today than in the chemical industry. What is to be done? One must bring about a condition of pure right — that is, one carried purely by the principle of equality. Such a condition does not exist in today's legal order; rights are marketed like potatoes. One must first *invent* this condition of unadulterated right in the very act of bringing it forth. For this, a legal framework is needed in which that is possible. Such a framework is offered in the present legal order through non-profit association law, commercial law and foundation law. The task is to ensure, as far as possible through non-profit bearerships, the inalienability of land and capital. To this end, wherever at all possible, an act of gift is necessary — or, through a one-time financing, *à fonds perdue*, a buyout of the land-holdings and the capital bound within them from old legal encumbrances (inheritance law, and so on). Once this is secured, new paths can be taken in trustee stewardship and right of use — in the sense that land and capital are made available for use, from purely spiritual points of view and excluding any claim of inheritance, to those who have qualified themselves for it both spiritually-ideally in the sense of spiritual science and practically in craft. The trustee stewardship rests in the hands of those who are in a position to carry the spiritual impulse of biodynamic farming forward — through the changes of the historical advance of humanity — from one generation of cultivators to the next.