Eine freie Initiative von Menschen bei mit online Lesekreisen, Übungsgruppen, Vorträgen ... |
| Use Google Translate for a raw translation of our pages into more than 100 languages. Please note that some mistranslations can occur due to machine translation. |
Translations:Manfred Klett: Von der Agrartechnologie zur Landbaukunst/231/en
of a farm lose as many nutrients as are contained in the crops sold off it.[1] From this conclusion he founded his mineral fertiliser theory, according to which the nutrient present in minimum quantity limits the yield. Liebig — who stood with one foot still in German Idealism and with the other in the rising materialism of the second half of the nineteenth century — was convinced that the loss of the soil-bound core nutrients, phosphorus, potassium, and others, must be replaced in the soil through manuring. He judged differently, in opposition to the prevailing doctrine, regarding nitrogen: for this, nature itself would have to provide. Set against him were his opponents, the advocates of nitrogen fertilisation, who in the course of time gained the upper hand. A posthumous vindication for Liebig was the realisation and confirmation of his theses by the farmer Schultz-Lupitz (1831–1899),[2] who, after decades of endeavour, succeeded in significantly improving the yield level of the extremely poor sandy soils of Lupitz by deepening the humus profile.
- ↑ Justus von Liebig: Die organische Chemie in ihrer Anwendung auf Agrikulturchemie und Physiologie, Braunschweig 1840.
- ↑ Asmus Petersen: Schultz-Lupitz und sein Vermächtnis, Stiftung Ökologischer Landbau (SÖL), Sonderausgabe Nr. 38, 2. Aufl. 1992, 66 S. Mit Vorworten von Gerhardt Preuschen und Wolfgang Schaumann.






